Card Player Magazine, available in print and online, covers poker strategy, poker news, online and casino poker, and poker legislation. Sign up today for a digital subscription to access more than 800 magazine issues and get 26 new issues per year!
A player bets 1.7 million. Another player goes all-in. The original bettor asks for a count and the dealer says it is 17.2 million. The player calls, but as the chips are counted out, it becomes clear that the all-in is for 22.2 million, not 17.2. The player objects to having to call the entire 22.2 million, and the Tournament Director (TD) is called for a ruling. What should the TD decide?
Let’s begin with a review of the rule on “Count of Opponent’s Chip Stack.” During the World Series of Poker telecast, color commentator Norman Chad whined about players asking their opponents how many chips they had behind, presumably because it slowed down the action.
Oklahoma casino age limit. Casino Size: 5,000 Square Feet Games Offered: Slots, Video Poker Overnight RV Parking: No Senior Discount: Various Tuesdays if 55 or older. Try an online casino for FREE. We have over 15 No Deposit Bonus Codes. No credit card needed, just sign up and start playing! Duck Creek Casino was established in 2003 and is conveniently located between Glenpool and Okmulgee on Hwy 75, just minutes south of Tulsa. Guests love our wide variety of games, great food, relaxing environment and excellent customer service plus we’re now serving beer!
There is a simple solution to the problem. As Nancy Reagan used to advise: Just Say No. There is no requirement that you answer that question. WSOP Rule 62 provides only that “participants are entitled to a reasonable estimation of opponent’s chip stacks.” That is why players are often admonished to keep their bigger denomination chips in front and not to “barber pole” their chips by mixing denominations, preventing the visual estimate that the rule requires.
No personal attacks, no trolling, no baiting, no witch hunts and no posting personal information.Be helpful and answer questions that are asked. Don't send your fellow fans away to Google or GameFAQs on an aimless quest.No excessive self-promotion. Patches and fanworks are fine.No major game spoilers in post titles, in your comments.Be respectful. Dragon quest 4 walkthrough ds.
The final table has been determined at the 2019 European Poker Tour (EPT) Prague Main Event, the final EPT stop of the year (though with two weeks left in the year, perhaps that latter point is. Stephen Chidwick Wins PokerStars European Poker Tour Prague Super High Roller for €725,710. Bertrand Grospellier Eliminated in 2nd Place (€501,590) Straight Flush Beats Nut Flush as Grospellier Doubles Up. Grospellier Doubles Up. Adrian Mateos Eliminated in 3rd Place (€320,170) Steve O'Dwyer Eliminated in 4th Place (€245,460). Dec 16, 2019 Gaby Livshitz is chip leader with five players left in the PokerStars European Poker Tour. He is joined by Ricardo Da Rocha, Norbert Szecsi, Tomas Paiva and Mikalai Pobal. Licenced and regulated by The UK Gambling Commission for customers in Great Britain playing on our online sites or at our land based casinos/bingo clubs.
The World Series of Poker Europe has a new home in 2017. For the first time in the decade-long history of WSOPE, the tournament moves to the Czech Republic, in King's Casino, Rozvadov. King's boasts the largest poker room in Europe, with 160 tables and a soon-to-be-completed hotel with 250 rooms. Hybrid Ceramic Chip Ceramic Custom Poker Chips View larger image 10g EPT Ceramic Poker Chip 40x3mm US $0.15-0.3 / Piece 500 Pieces (Min.800 × 533 - 112k - jpg copy-statement.cf European poker tour chip counts. Learn european poker tour chips The Game At Pokerstars PokerStars is the legalidade poker online brasil largest online poker site. The €1,100 EPT National at the European Poker Tour in Prague is down to its final six. They'll play down to a winner on Wednesday, who will receive €375K!
But a player is entitled to a precise count when facing an all-in bet. Rule 62 goes on to state: “Participants may only request a more precise count if facing an all-in bet. The all-in participant is not required to count; if he opts not to, the dealer or floor will count it.” And then the rule ominously concludes: “Accepted action applies.”
So in our hypothetical – which is of course, not hypothetical but actually happened deep in this summer’s main event, Nick Marchington went all-in for 22.2 million. The dealer then counted it out and incorrectly announced 17.2 million before Dario Sammartino called. After the mistake was pointed out, Sammartino protested, and the floor personnel ruled that his call would stand as a call of 22.2 million, citing the accepted action rule. That rule provides:
- 104. Accepted Action: Poker is a game of alert, continuous observation. It is the caller’s responsibility to determine the correct amount of an opponent’s bet before calling, regardless of what is stated by the dealer or participants. If a caller requests a count but receives incorrect information from the dealer or participants, then places that amount in the pot, the caller is assumed to accept the full correct action & is subject to the correct wager or all-in amount.
Unfortunately for Sammartino, as he continued to argue, the dealer put out the flop. At that point, Tournament Director Jack Effel arrived at the scene. Effel could have simply ruled that it was now too late to appeal the ruling to him, for a player should be stopped from claiming a rules violation after play has continued. Nevertheless, Effel affirmed the decision, stating that the accepted action rule was clear. He then gratuitously added, “If you’re calling 17, you’re calling 22,” as though that was the reason for his ruling.
Of course, Effel did not have to follow the rule. WSOP Rule 56 states:
- 56. Floor People: The event Tournament Director, Managers, and Supervisors are to consider the best interest of the game and fairness as the top priority in the decision-making process. Unusual circumstances can on occasion dictate that decisions in the interest of fairness take priority over the technical rules. The WSOP Tournament Director reserves the right to overrule any floor decision.
Had Effel arrived before the flop, would it have been “in the best interest of the game and fairness” for Effel to rule for Sammartino (either by limiting both the bet and Sammartino’s call to the announced amount of 17.2 million or by allowing Sammartino to withdraw his call) in spite of the technical rule? Perhaps Effel did not cut any slack in Sammartino’s case because he thought that enforcing the rule was not a great a hardship to Sammartino.
As a counter-example, in the 2012 main event, Andras Koroknai went all-in and then, after one player folded, mucked his hand, wrongly thinking there were no more callers. Although the rules would have called the hand dead, Effel determined that he was not going to end a player’s tournament on such a mistake.
While it was unfortunate that he said, “If you’re calling 17, you’re calling 22,” since he does not know that for sure, it could charitably be said that what he meant was that the amount of the mistake was not so significant as to require a deviation from the rule in the interest of fairness. If it had been a difference of a million or two, Sammartino would have suffered little harm; if it had been a difference of 10 million or more, it would have been more significant. As it was, the difference was right in the middle, which makes the fair outcome problematic.
In applying a rule, it can be helpful to look at the principle behind the rule. This problem can be likened to those situations in law where there are two innocent parties, and we must determine which of them should bear the loss. One factor to consider in allocating that loss is to determine which person was in the better position to prevent the loss, which in this case would be the person better able to prevent the mistake.
The accepted action rule seems to be premised on the view that the caller is better able to avoid the loss, for the rule states that “[i]t is the caller’s responsibility to determine the correct amount of an opponent’s bet before calling.” But how can the caller make that determination? Only by asking the dealer, and it does not seem unreasonable to rely on what the dealer says. On the other hand, the bettor should have a good sense of how much the bet is for, even if it is an all-in bet, so the bettor may well be in the better position to prevent the loss.
When the dealer announced 17.2 million, Marchington was in a good position to know of the mistake and to correct it, so the rule could have put the burden on him. Under the rule as currently written, however, he had no obligation to correct the mistake. Perhaps ultimately it is a rule of administrative convenience – if there are good arguments for putting the risk on either party, it may be arbitrary to choose one, but a choice has to be made.
Effel was right that under Rule 104, which puts the burden on the caller, the decision is the correct one. As to whether he should have exercised discretion under Rule 56 to rule otherwise in the interest of fairness, there can be reasonable disagreement, at least if he had arrived before the flop. But since the initial ruling was appealed to him after the flop was dealt out, it was too late at that point to change the ruling.
European Poker Tour Season 7
Ironically, those of us watching at home knew that Marchington was all-in for 22.2 million and were immediately aware of the mistake because the chip counts are displayed at the top of the screen. Why shouldn’t this information be available to players as well? It could be argued that estimating other players’ chip count is an important skill and the display would eliminate that advantage. But when there are two tables remaining, as there were when this situation arose, it would be helpful for players to know what the chip counts are at the other table in order to help them make ICM (Independent Chip Model) decisions, and no amount of skill would help them obtain that information.
Perhaps most importantly, if the information was readily available, it would make Norman Chad happy because players would not have to ask others for their chip counts. I predict this display will come to the WSOP eventually.
Scott J. Burnham is Professor Emeritus at Gonzaga University School of Law. He can be reached at [email protected].
Table Of Contents
Day 2 of the 2019 PokerStars EPT Prague €10,300 EPT High Roller has seen 10 one-hour levels played to their completion and a field including many of the world’s best turned up with their sights set on advancing to the final day of one of the most prestigious events on the European Poker Tour.
Late registration was open until the start of play this afternoon, and 10 players showed up to add their names to the Day 2 roster of 117 that advanced from the 245 entries that were logged on the opening day of the tournament. That number was whittled down to 17, with Simon Lofberg (2,205,000) leading the way.
EPT Prague €10,300 High Roller Seating Draw
| Seat | Table 1 | Chip Count | Table 2 | Chip Count | Table 3 | Chip Count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sam Greenwood | 110,000 | Rainer Kempe | 505,000 | Tsugunari Toma | 410,000 |
| 2 | Bhavin Khatri | 425,000 | Daniel Dvoress | 185,000 | Simon Pedersen | 505,000 |
| 3 | Masato Yokosawa | 1,685,000 | ||||
| 4 | Gianluca Speranza | 720,000 | George Wolff | 1,115,000 | ||
| 5 | Simon Lofberg | 2,205,000 | Kemal Aslan | 850,000 | ||
| 6 | Ludovic Geilich | 675,000 | Matthias Eibinger | 605,000 | ||
| 7 | Yunye Lu | 1,085,000 | Fahredin Mustafov | 460,000 | ||
| 8 | Thi Nguyen | 595,000 | Arsenii Karmatckii | 665,000 |
Remaining Payouts
| Place | Payout (EUR) | Payout (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | €523,120 | $583,054 |
| 2 | €352,230 | $392,585 |
| 3 | €248,340 | $276,792 |
| 4 | €201,340 | $224,408 |
| 5 | €159,290 | $177,540 |
| 6 | €120,950 | $134,807 |
| 7 | €88,300 | $98,417 |
| 8 | €64,560 | $71,957 |
| 9 | €53,430 | $59,551 |
| 10-11 | €45,270 | $50,457 |
| 12-13 | €40,320 | $44,939 |
| 14-15 | €36,610 | $40,804 |
| 16-17 | €32,900 | $36,669 |
Other Big Stacks
Following in the counts are Masato Yokosawa (1,685,000), George Wolff (1,115,000), and Yunye Lu (1,085,000). Those four are the only ones above 1 million in chips, but they are far from the only familiar names set to return for Day 3.
The Day 3 lineup is loaded from top to bottom, even for a tournament of this stature. Ludovic Geilich (675,000), Matthias Eibinger (605,000), and Rainer Kempe (505,000) are a few more of the players to have bagged come the end of Day 2.
Tsugunari Toma (410,000), Daniel Dvoress (185,000), and Sam Greenwood also had chips in play when Day 2 ended, with the trio set to enter Day 3 as the bottom three on the leader board.
Day 2 Action
Players like Ryan Riess, Nick Marchington, Ognyan Dimov, and Jorryt van Hoof were among the Day 2 registrants, coming into the day just 25 big blinds. All of them found their ways to the rail before too long, bowing out with others like Jan-Eric Schwippert, Jose Quintas, and Adrian Mateos during the first few levels of play on the day.
Day 1 chip leader Omar Lakhdari was another player unable to get anything going, starting the day by doubling Michael Soyza and then losing a huge coin flip to Gianluca Speranzawhen his pocket tens were unable to hold against Speranza’s ace-queen to find himself down to 65,000. In total, his day lasted for less than three levels of play before finding the rail long before the tournament got into the money.
Meanwhile, Soyza, Sam Grafton, Jimmy Guerrero, and Uri Reichenstein built stacks to put them near the top of the counts. Arsenii Karmatckii joined the crowd moments later and would stay there as the rest would all find their ways to zero before the money was reached.
Big Stacks and Bubble Bursts
Ludovic Geilich and Matthias Eibinger were a couple of the reasons for big stacks falling, as Geilich doubled through Reichenstein in a hand where both players got stacks in with a flush. Geilich faded the one out Reichenstein had to a straight flush and sent him to the rail. Geilich remained a fixture near the top of the counts for the rest of the night, while Eibinger was able to tread water as the number of players left in the field continued to drop.
The bubble was reached near the end of Level 17, an hour after the dinner break, and it lasted only one hand as Ghattas Kortas got the last of his chips in with ace-queen suited and ran into Ashkan Fattahi’s pocket kings. Fattahi would subsequently later be eliminated in 18th place, just a handful of minutes before play ended for the evening.
.When your opponent bets you will be offered odds based on the size of his bet. Texas hold'em starting hands odds. Work out pot oddsIn this hand, our opponent bets $26 into a $41.5 pot making the total pot size $67.5. How To Use This Pot Odds Cheat Sheet – Facing River Bet Example1. Essentially, it is your risk to reward ratio.Pot odds will tell you whether is it correct for you to call or fold based on what size our opponent bet and how many cards that will improve our hand.If you are interested in the learning poker math, check out our for some awesome books on poker math. For example, if your opponent bets half pot you will be offered odds of 3:1 on a call (call 1 to win 3).
Defending Champion Hecklen Bows Out
Anatoly Filatov and Viktor Katzenberger were also among the largest stacks in the room at different points in the day, and both players got into the money before stalling out.
Casino del sol. Desert Diamond Casino hosts comedy, boxing, job fair, music and other events.
Defending champion Henrik Hecklen’s run at defending his title ended when he finished the tournament in 28th place. Dvoress, on the other hand, started the day with a stack of 50,000. and rode a roller coaster that got him as high as 190,000 and back down to 60,000 before the second break of the day.
When the tournament reached the money, he was near the bottom of the counts with just 275,000 during Level 19 (6,000/12,000/12,000).
Field of Stars
Dvoress was among the company of EPT Prague High Roller champions Sam Greenwood and Tsugunari Toma when the redraw occurred. And they were not the only ones to have experienced success in earlier events: Eibinger, George Wolff, and Yake Wu were also present in the final 24.
Less than two full levels of play remained when the final three tables were reached, but the action didn’t stop. Katzenberger and Wu were just a couple of the eliminations over the final chunk of play in the evening, with Wu falling from grace after one point holding the chip lead with 1.3 million.
There was still time for a miraculous Greenwood revival, but he will still start the final day with just five big blinds.
Play will resume at 12:30 p.m. local time on Tuesday for Day 3 and is set to continue until a winner has been determined. Be sure to come back to PokerNews for continuing coverage of all the action along the road to victory as this tournament and the entire 2019 PokerStars EPT Prague festival looks to come to a close.
Finding a trustworthy room to play online poker can be a monumental burden. That's all the more true if you're just looking for a place to play poker for free. We've listed five of the best play-money poker sites to enjoy and help hone your skills.
Tags
European Poker TourEPTRelated Room
Full TiltRelated Tournaments
European Poker Tour
